The Cotswolds villages under threat from Labour: Residents claim 'algorithm-driven' housing targets could force communities to quadruple in size

By LETTICE BROMOVSKY, NEWS REPORTER Published: 10:21, 26 May 2026 | Updated: 10:22, 26 May 2026 Fury is growing in some of Britain's most picturesque villages after residents were told thousands of new homes could be built across the Cotswolds under government housing targets. Council leaders have warned that beauty spots famous for their rolling hills, honey-coloured stone cottages and historic market towns risk being transformed beyond recognition as ministers push ahead with plans to build 1.5 million homes across England. Under proposals now being consulted on, some villages could triple - or even quadruple - in size over the next two decades. The biggest fears centre on communities outside the protected Cotswolds National Landscape boundary, where campaigners say development pressure is now being funnelled. One of the most controversial plans would see hundreds of homes built near Ampney Crucis, a tiny Domesday village near Cirencester with a population of around 600. Locals say the scale of the proposed expansion would destroy the character of the area forever. Neil Holt, a resident of Ampney Crucis, said that 'dumping 660 houses on the edge of a village' would destroy the community. He added: '[the] governments come and go but the Cotswolds will be living with the consequences forever.' Your browser does not support iframes. The council's plans are in an effort to meet the government's national housing drive to build 1.5million homes in this parliament The row erupted after Cotswold District Council was instructed to plan for 18,650 new homes over the next 18 years under revised government calculations for housing demand.  Council leader Mike Evemy blasted the figures as 'detached from reality', warning that historic towns and villages were being forced to shoulder 'eyewatering housing numbers'. In a strongly worded appeal to ministers, he warned some communities 'could be overwhelmed by unprecedented levels of new development'. He also accused Whitehall of imposing 'an arbitrary housing number imposed by an algorithm that is designed to be one-size-fits-all, but which completely ignores the unique character and constraints of different areas across the country'. The Liberal Democrat council leader said soaring house prices compared to local wages had heavily skewed the figures against the district - triggering a more than 100 per cent increase in annual housing targets. Villages including Mickleton and Down Ampney are also expected to absorb significant new development, while larger towns such as Moreton-in-Marsh and Fairford face further expansion despite existing infrastructure concerns. Campaign group Moreton Against Over Development described the government target as 'a wanton act of vandalism'. Its chairman, councillor Neil Backwith, said Moreton-in-Marsh had already seen 900 homes built since 2010, leaving roads clogged and local services stretched. 'You queue to get into the town and queue to get out,' he said. 'It's horrible and completely ruins what is a beautiful little market town.' Residents responding to the consultation warned villages would be 'engulfed', while others spoke of 'fear, frustration and powerlessness'. Pictured: The market town of Moreton-in-Marsh, which welcomes large numbers of tourists every year An overhead capture of Moreton-in-Marsh, where the draft proposals suggest extending to the north, south and west of the market town and creating 1,710 new homes More than 80 per cent of the district is protected 'National Landscape', which the council says severely limits where houses can be built The council has also raised concerns over water shortages and pressure on sewage infrastructure if major building projects go ahead. There are additional fears that large housing developments in the south of the district could clash with military operations around RAF Fairford - a major US Air Force bomber base. The Ministry of Defence has reportedly voiced concerns about building large numbers of homes close to operational air bases. Evemy has repeatedly urged ministers to visit the district in person and reconsider the housing figures. 'We aren't alone in having requests for a rethink on housing requirement rejected,' he said. 'Every other council we've engaged on this issue is reporting the same outcome. I once again urge Mr Pennycook and his ministerial colleagues to visit our district, visit our towns and villages, and see first-hand what 'build, build, build' will look like in one of the world's most treasured landscapes.' But ministers have so far refused to back down. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook rejected calls for a rethink and insisted the government's revised housing formula would remain in place. A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'All areas, including the Cotswolds, must play their part to end the housing crisis and build the homes this country needs. 'Our revised housing targets will mean more homes are built in the right places, and councils will continue to have planning powers to protect the character of historic areas.' No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards. By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.