Sorry not sorry! Starmer admits he blundered by making Mandelson US envoy - but blames officials for failing to tell him peer failed security vetting... as even allies admit PM is 'not certain' to survive

By JAMES TAPSFIELD, UK POLITICAL EDITOR Published: 15:34, 20 April 2026 | Updated: 15:58, 20 April 2026 Keir Starmer mounted a brazen defence of his Peter Mandelson debacle today as he blamed the civil service for making him mislead Parliament and voters. The PM is facing furious MPs in the Commons, after it emerged the New Labour architect was made US ambassador against the recommendation of security vetting officials. Sir Keir started his statement by acknowledging he made the 'wrong' judgment by choosing Mandelson for the job. 'I should not have appointed Peter Mandelson,' he said.  But the premier went on to complain this afternoon that information about the security process was kept from him, saying the situation 'beggared belief'. 'If I had known before he took up his post... I would not have gone ahead with the appointment,' he said. The PM ousted Foreign Office chief Olly Robbins last week, insisting it was 'unforgivable' he was not told about the advice.  Sir Olly is now believed to be consulting lawyers, with allies adamant the mandarin did nothing wrong by going ahead with the posting.  Sir Keir was jeered in the chamber as he said the facts he had laid out were 'incredible'. He also avoided saying explicitly that he had misled the House, albeit inadvertently.  Kemi Badenoch shot back that Sir Keir had thrown another aide 'under the bus' after failing to ask questions and establish the facts for himself.  In other dramatic developments today:   Keir Starmer will run the gauntlet of MP fury in the Commons this afternoon as he desperately tries to shift the blame on to another 'fall guy' Sir Keir has ousted Foreign Office chief Olly Robbins (pictured), insisting it was 'unforgivable' the civil service did not tell him vetting officials advised against making Mandelson US ambassador Critics have pointed to an email from then-Cabinet Secretary Simon Case to Sir Keir in November 2024 suggesting that there should be a 'plan' to get security clearance for whomever was chosen as US ambassador The latest turmoil has renewed speculation about Sir Keir's future, with the PM having barely survived a coup attempt in February.  Addressing the Commons, Sir Keir said: 'Let me be very clear the recommendation in the Peter Mandelson case could and should have been shared with me before he took up his post. 'Let me make a second point, if I had known before he took up his post, the UKSV (UK Security Vetting) recommendation was that developed vetting clearance should be denied. I would not have gone ahead with the appointment.' Asked on Sky News whether Sir Keir will lead Labour into the next election, due in 2029, Mr Alexander said: 'I expect so, yes… I think he will.' He added: 'There are no certainties but but of course I think he will lead and I think he should because, frankly, on the biggest call in this parliament he's exercised the right judgment, which is to keep us out of someone else's war.' Mr Alexander said 'rightfully and reasonably' there were 'important questions that need to be answered today'. 'Keir Starmer is going to set out all the facts, the right place for those questions to be answered are at the despatch box of the House of Commons,' he said. Labour's leader in Scotland, Anas Sarwar, has already declared he has no confidence in Sir Keir and would rather he was replaced.  Lord Mandelson was sacked last year, just nine months into the Washington DC posting, after further details of his ties to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein emerged.  It is not clear why vetting officials advised against his appointment, and allies insisted he was not aware of the recommendation until last week.  Despite the advice, he is believed to have been granted the highest 'Strap 3' level of security clearance.  In a message to Sir Keir in November 2024, Mr Case set out what would happen if he went for a political candidate. 'If this is the route that you wish to take you should give us the name of the person you would like to appoint and we will develop a plan for them to acquire the necessary security clearances and do due diligence on any potential Conflicts of Interest or other issues of which you should be aware before confirming your choice,' he wrote.  'A letter is then needed from the Foreign Secretary to the PUS to FCDO formalising the decision to make a political appointment.'  In a significant escalation last night, the Government released what appeared to be internal legal advice suggesting there was no barrier to Sir Olly flagging the vetting conclusions.  Downing Street stressed that external appointments to the civil service were normally made 'subject to obtaining security clearance'.  The PM's spokesman hinted that Sir Keir will admit he misled Parliament over Mandelson's vetting situation, but only inadvertently. The premier repeatedly stated that 'due process' had been followed, and told a press conference that Mandelson had passed vetting. 'He is clear this information should have been provided to him and Parliament,' the spokesman said. A statement issued by No10 last night said that although civil servants rather than ministers make decisions on vetting and clearance, there was nothing in the law to prevent ministers being told. 'There is nothing in the guidance which prevented information being shared in this scenario, in a proportionate and necessary way and subject to the appropriate procedural steps,' the statement on the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act said. While there are 'legal obligations' under data protection rules, 'no law prevents civil servants – while continuing to protect such sensitive personal information – from sensibly flagging UK Security Vetting recommendations or high level risks and mitigations'. UKSV's privacy notice sets out there are 'limited circumstances in which relevant vetting information can be shared' if 'a security risk has been identified'. Sir Keir told the Mirror he would make it 'crystal clear' to MPs that he had been kept in the dark and it was 'unforgivable' that the Foreign Office failed to tell him after he had offered public assurances that proper process had been followed. The PM said: 'The fact that I wasn't told that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting when he was appointed is astonishing. The fact that I wasn't told when I said to Parliament that due process had been followed is unforgivable, and that's why I intend to set out in Parliament on Monday the facts behind that, so there's full transparency in relation to it. Lord Mandelson was sacked last year, just nine months into the Washington DC posting, after further details of his ties to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein emerged Do YOU think Keir Starmer can survive this latest political row? What's your view? 'But am I furious that I wasn't told? Yes, I am. Am I furious that other ministers weren't told? Yes, I am. I should have been told, and I wasn't told.' But Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has said Sir Keir is 'either lying or he's incompetent'. Mrs Badenoch said: 'This has been a tawdry and shaming affair for you and your party, and for this country. 'Not only have you damaged our relationship with the United States and insulted the victims of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, but you have also undermined our national security by giving the highest diplomatic post to an individual that the security services found to be of 'high concern'.' Documents demanded by MPs about the Peter Mandelson appointment might not be released for weeks. The House of Commons ordered the disclosure of a huge set of internal papers and messages in February, following a Labour revolt. But although an initial set was published on March 11, much of the key information has yet to appear. On that date Cabinet minister Darren Jones said it would be issued 'in the coming weeks'.  The material is not expected to be released alongside Keir Starmer's statement to the House this afternoon. And with Parliament expected to be prorogued on April 29, the prospects of the second batch appearing before MPs return for the King's Speech on May 13 look to be dwindling. That is after the local elections on May 7, when Labour is facing a battering at the hands of Reform.  The comments below have been moderated in advance. The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline. By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.