NFL wins collusion grievance, but ruling reveals push to limit guaranteed contracts

AFC EastBillsDolphinsJetsPatriotsAFC NorthBengalsBrownsRavensSteelersAFC SouthColtsJaguarsTexansTitansAFC WestBroncosChargersChiefsRaidersNFC EastCommandersCowboysEaglesGiantsNFC NorthBearsLionsPackersVikingsNFC SouthBuccaneersFalconsPanthersSaintsNFC West49ersCardinalsRamsSeahawksScores & ScheduleStandingsFantasyNFL OddsNFL PicksNFL DraftPodcastsScoop City NewsletterThe BeastTop 100 Rankings3-Round Mock DraftNFL Draft OrderFree Agency TrackerNFL wins collusion grievance, but ruling reveals push to limit guaranteed contractsThe NFLPA filed the grievance against the NFL in 2022. Luke Hales / Getty Images Share full articleThe three-person panel presiding over the NFL Players Association’s appeal of the collusion grievance filed against the NFL has upheld the arbitrator’s finding that there was insufficient evidence that some or all teams agreed to collude against the players. The NFLPA filed a grievance against the NFL in 2022, alleging that NFL officials had encouraged teams to resist free-agent players’ requests — notably top quarterbacks — for fully guaranteed contracts that offseason. When the arbitrator presiding over the grievance, Judge Christopher F. Droney, ruled there wasn’t enough proof teams had colluded against players, the union filed an appeal in January 2025. Then-NFLPA executive director Lloyd Howell drew criticism for agreeing to keep the findings of that ruling from player leaders despite having filed the appeal. Roughly 15 months later, the three-person appeal panel agreed with the original ruling, and thus, the players were not awarded any financial damages. When reached for comment, an NFL spokesman said, “We are pleased with the panel’s decision to reaffirm the dismissal of the case, bringing to an end three years of litigation.” In a memo issued to NFLPA player leaders, new executive director J.C. Tretter expressed disappointment with the ruling but highlighted positive elements of the findings. The Athletic obtained a copy of Tretter’s memo. In the eight-page briefing, a copy of which was also obtained by The Athletic, the panel agreed there was indeed evidence NFL leaders encouraged teams to agree not to distribute fully guaranteed contracts. The briefing said the “efforts to solve the perceived problem by encouraging joint action by its member Clubs was improper.” Though the panel agreed with Droney that there wasn’t enough evidence that “some or all Clubs” followed that urging to avoid awarding fully guaranteed contracts, they said, “We cannot fathom these sophisticated businesspeople did not comprehend they were being encouraged to limit or reduce guaranteed contracts.” Tretter, in his memo, told his team, “It’s important to note that the panel reaffirmed the arbitrator’s finding that the NFL had encouraged and invited clubs to take steps to reduce salary guarantees and bonuses during a March team owners’ meeting. The panel also found that the clubs heard and understood the plain meaning of the message they received from the NFL regarding guaranteed salaries.” Tretter added, “While we are disappointed by the ruling, this outcome does not erase the clear and important findings in regards to the NFL’s collusive behavior.” Time will tell how the findings of the investigation and ruling affect future negotiations of free-agent contracts and the next collective bargaining agreement. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Mike Jones joined The Athletic as a national NFL writer in 2022 after five years at USA Today, where he covered the NFL, and eight years at The Washington Post, where he covered the Washington Commanders. He previously covered the Washington Wizards for The Washington Times. Mike is a native of Warrenton, Va.