‘Menstrual leave isn’t plea for privilege’: Karnataka HC orders state to ‘strictly and faithfully’ implement policy

Weather ePaper Today’s Paper Journalism of Courage Home ePaper Politics Explained Opinion India Business Premium Cities UPSC Entertainment Sports World Lifestyle Tech Subscribe Sign In TrendingUPSC OfferIPL 2026US NewsPuzzles & GamesLegal NewsFresh TakeHealthResearch🎙️ Podcast Advertisement function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript() { if (window.jQuery) { // jQuery is loaded, include your script jQuery(document).ready(function($) { // Your existing script for checking window width if (window.innerWidth) var page_w = window.innerWidth; else if (document.all) var page_w = document.body.clientWidth; if (page_w > 1024) { $(".add-left, .add-right").show(); } else { $(".add-left, .add-right").hide(); } }); } else { // jQuery is not loaded, check again after 0.2 seconds setTimeout(checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript, 200); } } // Initial call to the function checkAndLoadWindowSizeScript(); NewsLegal‘Menstrual leave isn't plea for privilege’: Karnataka HC orders state to ‘strictly and faithfully’ implement policy ‘Menstrual leave isn’t plea for privilege’: Karnataka HC orders state to ‘strictly and faithfully’ implement policy The Karnataka High Court made the observations while hearing a petition filed by a hotel worker, seeking a direction to the state government to effectively implement its notifications regarding menstrual leave. Written by: Express News Service4 min readBengaluruApr 16, 2026 09:40 AM IST The Karnataka High Court directed the state government to ensure effective operationalisation of the menstrual leave policy through suitable guidelines, circulars, and administrative instructions. (File Photo) Make us preferred source on Google Whatsapp twitter Facebook Reddit PRINT The Karnataka High Court Wednesday directed the state government to ensure the implementation of its menstrual leave policy in both the organised and unorganised sectors, saying it is not merely a matter of “administrative discretion, but is intrinsically connected to realisation of a fundamental right”. Stating that menstruation, often referred to as periods, is not an aberration, but a natural and indispensable facet of women’s reproductive cycle, the bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna directed the strict and faithful implementation of the existing policy, pending the formal enactment of the proposed legislation. “Further, upon such enactment, the State shall, without undue delay, frame appropriate Rules so as to give full and meaningful effect to the statutory mandate,” Justice M Nagaprasanna said in the order. “Men and women stand equal in the eyes of the law, yet they are biologically distinct. To acknowledge such differences, particularly in matters concerning health, dignity, and bodily autonomy, is not to transgress the guarantee of equality, but to give it substantive meaning,” Justice Nagaprasanna said. “True equality, as envisioned by the Constitution, demands a more compassionate and nuanced approach, one that acknowledges difference not as a ground for discrimination, but as a basis for accommodation… Menstrual leave is not a plea for privilege, but an assertion of dignity, fairness and humane understanding within the spaces women inhabit.” The court directed the state government to ensure effective operationalisation of the menstrual leave policy through suitable guidelines, circulars, and administrative instructions, “as may be necessary to secure its uniform, consistent, and rigorous implementation across all sectors.” The court made the observations while hearing a petition filed by Chandravva Hanamant Gokavi, who works in a hotel at Belgavi. Gokavi approached the Karnataka High Court seeking a direction to the state government to effectively implement its notifications dated November 12 and November 20, 2025, which provide for a day’s paid menstrual leave per month to women employees. Appearing for the petitioner, Advocate Deeksha N Amruthesh pointed to Gokavi’s work environment and said that it is not only physically taxing, but also bereft of adequate standards of hygiene and dignity. Amruthesh said women, irrespective of the nature or location of their employment, are often compelled to undertake physically strenuous labour even during their menstrual cycle. She said the state is under an obligation to take the necessary steps to sensitise workplaces across the organised and vast unorganised sectors. Additional Advocate General Prathima Honnapura, representing the Karnataka Government, informed the court that the policy formulated by the state is traceable to and supported by enabling provisions and directive principles embodied in the Constitution of India. ‘Deeply rooted in constitutional promise of equality’ The bench noted that the state government has tabled The Karnataka Menstrual Leave and Hygiene Bill, 2025, before the Assembly. The Bill provides women with a monthly, paid menstrual leave in both government offices and private establishments and a 2 per cent attendance relaxation for girl students in government and private educational institutions. “The executive power of the State, flowing from Article 162 of the Constitution of India, furnishes the necessary authority to translate constitutional aspirations into tangible policy measures. The State has articulated the present policy and has proceeded to usher in the proposed legislation, thereby giving concrete expression to the spirit and intent of the Constitution,” Justice Nagaprasanna said. “The significance of menstrual leave policy is not merely administrative, but deeply rooted in the constitutional promise of equality that embraces all citizens, beneath its expansive canopy.” Meanwhile, a coordinate bench of the Karnataka High Court is hearing a batch of petitions filed by the Bangalore Hotels Association and others challenging the government policy, saying that it does not fall within the ambit of any law.