Explosive back-and-forth between Justices Alito and Sotomayor forces Supreme Court into unusual move as tensions rise

By BREANNE DEPPISCH, US SENIOR POLITICAL REPORTER Published: 23:04, 26 June 2026 | Updated: 23:06, 26 June 2026 The Supreme Court issued a rare public statement Friday after two Justices got into an unusually explosive argument. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito had a terse exchange with his colleague, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, following the release of a highly anticipated immigration decision - a rare win for Donald Trump - on Thursday. The exchange came after Alito delivered the majority opinion in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, which granted Trump a key 6-3 victory allowing federal immigration officers to turn away asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border.   Sotomayor took the rare step of reading her dissent from the bench. The practice, while somewhat uncommon, is certainly not unheard of - and justices are made aware of such plans beforehand.  This was the case when Sotomayor, who was appointed by Barack Obama, read aloud her sharply worded, 35-page dissent during Thursday's release of opinions.  But her 10-minute diatribe appeared to catch Alito off guard. 'There’s much that I would have added to my bench statement had I known there would be a dissent read,' Alito said tersely.  Seeking to calm the waters more than 24 hours after his remarks made national news, the Court was forced to issue a statement, calling it a 'misunderstanding.' It's now fueling speculation about rising underlying tensions among the justices. The Supreme Court justices are seen posing for a group portrait. Justices sided with the Trump administration 6-3 on two major immigration and asylum cases Immigration protesters outside the Supreme Court The Supreme Court on Friday said in a statement that the incident in question was a 'misunderstanding.'  'Justice Alito was notified in advance by Justice Sotomayor’s chambers that she would be reading a dissent from the bench,' a spokesperson for the high court told CNN.  'It was a misunderstanding on Justice Alito’s part,' they added. The Supreme Court did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on the back-and-forth between Alito and Sotomayor. Justices ruled along ideological lines that migrants seeking refuge do not ‘arrive’ in the country by ‘attempting, and failing, to step foot’ in the United States - clearing the way for the administration to restart its so-called 'turn back' policy. Alito read the majority opinion for the court.  In writing the majority opinion, Alito said the case ‘presents a straightforward question’: whether someone is considered having ‘arrived’ to the US while still at the US-Mexico border, or when they are physically present in the United States.  The majority of justices ruled that they must be physically present in the United States.  Sotomayor and the court's other liberal justices sharply disagreed.  The Supreme Court building in Washington, DC The highly-anticipated immigration decision that was a win for Trump Demonstrators protest against US President Donald Trump and his administration's immigration policies in Washington, DC Members of the TPS, or Temporary Protected Status Alliance, rally outside the Supreme Court  ‘The Court today holds that the Executive Branch may circumvent all these mandatory procedures by having US immigration officers stand at the border and physically block noncitizens from setting a foot onto U.S. soil,’ Sotomayor said in her dissent. ‘They may do so even if the asylum seeker is at the threshold of a port of entry designated to receive all noncitizens who seek entrance into the country,' Sotomayor continued.  'Even if the port of entry has ample capacity to inspect that person, including an available asylum officer trained to process asylum applications. Even if the asylum seeker is certain to be persecuted, or killed, if she is turned away.’  It's not the first time the Supreme Court justices have made headlines for breaking, even slightly, with a time-honored sense of decorum.  Sotomayor issued an apology earlier this year for what she described as 'hurtful' public comments about her colleague, conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh. 'At a recent appearance at the University of Kansas School of Law, I referred to a disagreement with one of my colleagues in a prior case, but I made remarks that were inappropriate,' Sotomayor said in a statement earlier this year.  'I regret my hurtful comments. I have apologized to my colleague.' The comments below have not been moderated. The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline. By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual. Do you want to automatically post your MailOnline comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to MailOnline as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on MailOnline. To do this we will link your MailOnline account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.