⚡ عاجل: كريستيانو رونالدو يُتوّج كأفضل لاعب كرة قدم في العالم●⚡ أخبار عاجلة تتابعونها لحظة بلحظة على خبر●⚡ تابعوا آخر المستجدات والأحداث من حول العالم●
AI اقتراحات ذكية
AI مباشر|--مشاهد مباشر
872,948مقال404مصدر نشط228قناة مباشرة5,342خبر اليوم
THE Sindh government’s 28-point list of restrictions imposed on Aurat March Karachi is a distressing example of familiar double standards: women are celebrated in speeches and choreographed photo opportunities, only for the state to recoil the moment they demand their rights.
The organisers sought permission to march peacefully for women’s rights. What they received, instead, was a document dripping with authoritarian anxiety. The message could not have been clearer: women may gather, but only if they remain politically harmless.
Rather than facilitating peaceful assembly, the administration chose to police slogans, speech and even clothing. The vague and sweeping conditions betray insecurity.
Why does a march calling attention to gender violence and economic inequality provoke such discomfort in official circles? Why are women demanding bodily autonomy and constitutional rights treated as a threat?
Secure governments do not fear placards, nor do they attempt to dictate what citizens may wear while exercising their rights.
Across Pakistan, as in the rest of the world, the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of violence against women are men. Women face harassment in streets, workplaces and homes. They are subjected to ‘honour’ killings, domestic abuse, forced marriages and institutional discrimination.
Yet instead of confronting the structures that enable such violence, the state’s instinct is to regulate women themselves. The state appears unable to tolerate women speaking in their own voice without bureaucratic approval.
There is an undertone of ‘women should be seen and not heard’ running through these directives — an outdated view masquerading as administrative procedure.
Just consider: in 2026, women in Pakistan must still seek permission to demand dignity while the state reserves the right to determine how loudly, how politically and even how appropriately dressed they may be while doing so. We have miles to go before we can claim to be a progressive society.
ملاحظة تحريرية | Editorial Note:
نُشر هذا المقال في الأصل بواسطة Dawn.
خبر (Khabr) هي منصة إعلامية أردنية مرخّصة تعمل بالذكاء الاصطناعي.
نضيف قيمة تحريرية من خلال: تحليل ذكي للأخبار، ملخصات تلقائية، رواية صوتية بالذكاء الاصطناعي، ترجمة متعددة اللغات، وتدقيق الحقائق.
هدفنا جعل الأخبار أكثر وضوحاً وسهولةً للقارئ العربي.
This article was originally published by Dawn.
Khabr is a licensed Jordanian AI-powered news platform (Registration #82086).
We add editorial value through: AI-powered news analysis, automated summaries, AI audio narration, multi-language translation (Arabic, English, French, Turkish), and AI fact-checking.
Our mission is to make news more accessible and understandable for Arabic-speaking audiences worldwide.
هذا الخبر ضمن تغطية خبر لقسم سياسة.
نقدّم لك تحليلات ذكية وملخصات يومية لأهم الأخبار من مصادر موثوقة متعددة.
المصدر: Dawn.
يوجد 6 مقالات مرتبطة بهذا الموضوع.
This article is part of Khabr's coverage of Politics.
We provide AI-powered analysis, summaries, and multi-source aggregation to keep you informed.
Source: Dawn.
Tags: Aurat March, restrictions, women's rights.
🍪 نستخدم ملفات تعريف الارتباط لتحسين تجربتك وعرض الإعلانات المخصصة. باستخدامك للموقع، فإنك توافق على سياسة ملفات تعريف الارتباط وسياسة الخصوصية.
We use cookies to enhance your experience and show personalized ads. By using this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
FREEFree 1GB Internet + Free International Calls
$1 trial — eSIM in 190+ countries — No roaming charges