Aston Villa are a team who work the margins. That can be costly

AFC BournemouthArsenalAston VillaBrentfordBrighton & Hove AlbionBurnleyChelseaCrystal PalaceEvertonFulhamLeeds UnitedLiverpoolManchester CityManchester UnitedNewcastle UnitedNottingham ForestSunderlandTottenham HotspurWest Ham UnitedWolverhampton WanderersScores & ScheduleStandingsFantasyThe Athletic FC NewsletterPodcastsArsenal Back on TopAnalysing the Run-inTitle Race in NumbersRe-Refereeing Chelsea vs. Leeds 1970Premier Unai Emery cut a frustrated figure in the defeat to Fulham Ryan Pierse/Getty Images Share articlePau Torres’s raking pass intended for Leon Bailey fell short. With the same look of exasperation he had worn all afternoon, Aston Villa manager Unai Emery agitated to get the Spanish defender’s attention. He shouted first to get Torres to look over, then furiously motioned for the ball to be kept on the floor and for shorter, swifter passes. This moment took place in the final minutes of Aston Villa’s 1-0 defeat away to Fulham on Saturday. Emery’s instructions were both too late and encapsulated the failings of his side. It was a reminder of last September, in the game at Sunderland, when Emery scolded Harvey Elliott for “passing too quickly”, the Liverpool loanee having attempted a long ball which rolled out of play. Back then, Villa were teetering on the cliff of a full-blown crisis. They had drawn 1-1 against their newly-promoted hosts despite having a player more for more than an hour, extending their winless start to the Premier League season to five matches. The tone of the day was set before kick-off when the team coach arrived at the stadium late after Emery’s final pre-match meeting overran. Emery was so furious at full time that he had to be cajoled into attending his post-match press conference. Once his ire cooled a few days later, he was more phlegmatic, asserting that his players needed to get back to “the structure”. Still, he was concerned Villa would spend the season looking down the league table rather than up. However, the ramifications were far different in sunny and idyllic west London yesterday. Yes, Villa lost to Fulham, but they are still nestled in a Champions League spot and seem increasingly likely to stay in those prized five places, even after this defeat. The broader picture, especially with the first leg of a Europa League semi-final against fellow Premier League side Nottingham Forest to come on Thursday, remains one of excitement. The display at Craven Cottage, though, was a reminder of Villa’s deficiencies. Emery had been incessant in wanting shorter, faster balls from his deeper players, with Villa’s best opportunity of the afternoon stemming from brave passing in combination in the first half, coaxing Fulham onto them before John McGinn whipped a ball into the space behind. Morgan Rogers fired wide from the ensuing chance, yet the sweeping move — teasing passes before going through the gears as play progressed upfield — was what Villa often desire, but can sometime lack. Villa do have a tendency to allow games to drift. This is both a fault but, strangely, is also through design. This season, no team in the division have won more games by a one-goal margin than their 12, with Emery creating a structure, particularly away from home, that keeps opponents at arm’s length before making small, more attack-minded tweaks in the second half, as the match develops and more space appears. The quiet efficiency that underlies everything tends to preserve energy levels, which is a critical, albeit understated ingredient in Emery’s success in European competitions throughout his managerial career. This risk is when this carefulness crosses over into lethargy. Villa allowed Fulham, who had not scored in five of their previous six matches across all competitions, to control possession and territory in the first half. Home supporters, characteristically polite, implored their team to move the ball forward and ironically sang “We’ve had a shot” after a deflected effort ballooned comfortably into goalkeeper Emiliano Martinez’s hands. This all contributed to making yesterday’s 12.30pm kick-off a leisurely affair, reflective of the stadium’s setting; bathed in spring sunshine and with the River Thames running by. Even in Emery’s attempts to infuse intensity into his side by acting as an extra ball boy in the game’s final stages, Villa only registered a single shot on target. This was a consequence of a lack of incisive passing and the opportunities they did create — falling to Ollie Watkins and Tammy Abraham — being fired over the goal. As this Premier League campaign has perhaps demonstrated more than most others, Villa do not need to be implacable to achieve their objectives. They simply have to hold their nerve and watch those around them continue to flounder. After this defeat, Emery’s men have only taken 19 points from 15 league matches this calendar year. They are not indefatigable by any measure. But nor do they need to be. The manager’s incessant harping about Villa’s “structure” is, fundamentally, why they are on course to qualify for the Champions League over the coming weeks. The system, well-drilled over the past three and a half years under him, gives players muscle memory, yet in isolated defeats, it can seem stuck in a malaise. Eleven straight wins across all competitions in November and December offered a spike in performance that very few teams, aside from Arsenal, have matched this season. This provided a comfort blanket and a lead that Chelsea and Liverpool, unable to shift the glare of scrutiny away from themselves, couldn’t replicate. Villa may have been the hunted for much of 2026, but those competitors have lacked predatory instinct.  Plainly, with Emery in charge, Villa accrue points, but frequently in unspectacular fashion, winning on the balance of fine margins and the manager’s tactical acumen. It is a tried and trusted formula which is likely to prove justified at the end of the season. Perceptions of Villa’s approach, though, tend to be determined by results. When they win, people praise their quiet efficiency. When they lose, it looks sluggish. Watkins completed a single pass in the first half-hour yesterday. Emery said his players were not effective pressing high, so retreated to a compact mid-to-low block. In the event of turnovers, with Fulham’s full-backs stepping onto Emery’s No 10s — a “big risk”, counterpart Marco Silva admitted afterwards — Villa struggled to cut through the press. When Villa did sustain attacks after the break, they did not show enough incision to expose the shortcomings of Fulham’s man-to-man press, which left the No 10 on the opposite side to the ball spare. Sporadic, quick switches of play did create openings. “We dominated more in the second half,” Emery said. “We could progress the ball more in the attacking third and created two good chances. Four chances in 90 minutes is where we could have scored one goal. We weren’t clinical.” Villa’s attacking strategy is reliant on being efficient. Keeping the overall structure secure does not lend itself to freewheeling attacking, instead playing on the tight margins. Emery asserted he was happy with the performance and felt that had Watkins, Abraham and Rogers shown more ruthlessness in front of goal, his approach would have been vindicated. Regardless, Villa let the game drift. Sometimes this helps them, and it is intended to do so. Other times, such as Saturday, it can cost them. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms