Arrests of critics in Ghana provokes alarm over free speech under Mahama

play Live Sign upShow navigation menu.css-15ru6p1{font-size:inherit;font-weight:normal;}Navigation menuNewsShow more news sectionsAfricaAsiaUS & CanadaLatin AmericaEuropeAsia PacificMiddle EastExplainedOpinionWorld CupVideoMoreShow more sectionsFeaturesEconomySportHuman RightsClimate CrisisInvestigationsInteractivesIn PicturesScience & TechnologyPodcastsTravelplay Live Click here to searchsearchSign upNavigation menucaret-leftTrendingUS-Israel war on IranTracking Israel's ceasefire violationsRussia-Ukraine warDonald TrumpWorld Cup 2026caret-rightNewsArrests of critics in Ghana provokes alarm over free speech under MahamaGhana’s 14 arrests in 16 months linked to false news have raised concerns about free speech. xwhatsapp-strokecopylinkgoogleAdd Al Jazeera on GoogleinfoA campaign image of then-presidential candidate John Mahama the election that brought him to power [Francis Kokoroko/Reuters]By Dwomoh-Doyen BenjaminPublished On 6 Jun 20266 Jun 2026Accra, Ghana – Ghana has recorded 14 arrests linked to false news and offensive speech in less than 16 months, nearly double the number documented during the previous administration’s entire eight-year tenure, according to the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA). The rise has triggered a sharp debate in one of West Africa’s most stable democracies over whether authorities are simply enforcing long-standing laws in a new digital environment, or edging into a more restrictive approach to public speech. The controversy carries added political weight because President John Mahama, while in opposition in 2022, warned that using state power to intimidate dissent was a “dangerous blueprint” for democracy. A senior ruling party official dismissed allegations that the arrests amount to a crackdown. “The opposition intentionally sponsors people to insult the President,” he told Al Jazeera. “When the law catches up with them, they cry persecution to score cheap political points.” He pointed to the case of TikToker Prince Ofori, known as “Fante Comedy”, who was arrested last August over alleged threats to President Mahama. Days after his arrest, Ofori appeared at a political rally alongside opposition figures, a development the official said showed how quickly such cases become politicised. “They paraded him at an opposition rally,” he said. Opposition leaders see something more troubling taking shape. Minority leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has been among the most outspoken critics. “The state-sponsored persecution must stop,” he told Al Jazeera. “Arresting citizens for words that do not constitute genuine threats is not justice. It is intimidation.” He said free speech has limits, but argued that the state is increasingly crossing a line. “Excessive use of state power risks undoing Ghana’s hard-won democratic gains,” he said. At the centre of the debate are long-standing provisions in Ghana’s Criminal Code and Electronic Communications Act, which authorities say are now being applied to a fast-moving digital landscape. Government supporters argue the increase in arrests reflects the explosion of anonymous and unregulated online content. Critics say the problem is not the laws themselves, but how they are being used. A legal consultant who reviewed recent cases said he counted at least 16 alleged misapplications of Section 208 in the past 18 months, compared with roughly a dozen in the previous eight years. “The law has been abused beyond repair,” he said. “Repeal is the only remedy.” Veteran journalist Ben Ephson said Ghana needs clearer guidance on where free expression ends and harm begins. “The government must properly explain the arrests so people can draw the line between press freedom and responsible journalism,” he said. He added that both journalists and state institutions risk overstepping if the rules remain unclear. “When you compare the freedom of the media and the rights of the individual, we need to be careful that the media, in trying to do their work, don’t trample on people’s rights,” he said. Others say Ghana’s debate mirrors tensions playing out in other democracies. Tegha King of the Universal Peace Federation Ghana said concerns about shrinking civic space are not unique to Ghana. “The global civic space must cultivate more free speech, not less,” he told Al Jazeera. He said stronger institutions, not more arrests, are needed to manage the pressures of the digital age. “There must be independent courts, transparent enforcement, media self-regulation and digital literacy,” he said. Some analysts point to gaps in public understanding of constitutional rights. “There is a lack of constitutional education among many Ghanaians,” said David Adofo of the African Chamber of Content Producers. “People must know the consequences of their actions before they act, not after.” Concerns are also being voiced outside the country. “We have had many concerns from diasporans about perceived erosion of press and political freedoms, especially news of blogger arrests,” said Nana Kofi Opoku-Agyemang of the NuGhana Expat Center. “Negative news sells fast. The government must be cautious so it does not project a negative image of Ghana in the diasporan community.” Officials insist there is no coordinated effort to silence dissent. An NDC communicator said the legal framework in question predates the current administration and defended the approach. “Ghana’s laws, Section 208 of the Criminal Code and Section 76 of the Electronic Communications Act, have been on the books for decades,” he said. “What has changed is the sheer volume of reckless, anonymous and sometimes dangerous content on social media. There is no systematic crackdown. There is simply enforcement of existing law.” A political irony at the centre of it all Ghana remains one of West Africa’s more open democracies, with a competitive political system and active media landscape. But the rise in speech-related arrests has sharpened scrutiny of how far the state can go in policing online expression without undermining the democratic culture that helped define its reputation. The debate is also politically charged because of Mahama’s own past warnings. As opposition leader, he described the use of state power against dissent as a “dangerous blueprint.” Today, critics say his government faces accusations it once condemned. For Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the moment calls for restraint — and reflection. “We should not continue to say that because it happened yesterday, it should happen today and tomorrow. That cycle must end,” he said. “President Mahama has an opportunity to leave a legacy of tolerance and free speech. I hope he takes it.” Advertisement AboutAboutShow moreAbout UsCode of EthicsTerms and ConditionsEU/EEA Regulatory NoticePrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyCookie PreferencesAccessibility StatementSitemapWork for usConnectConnectShow moreContact UsUser Accounts HelpAdvertise with usStay ConnectedNewslettersChannel FinderTV SchedulePodcastsSubmit a TipPaid Partner ContentOur ChannelsOur ChannelsShow moreAl Jazeera ArabicAl Jazeera EnglishAl Jazeera Investigative UnitAl Jazeera MubasherAl Jazeera DocumentaryAl Jazeera BalkansAJ+Our NetworkOur NetworkShow moreAl Jazeera Centre for StudiesAl Jazeera Media InstituteLearn ArabicAl Jazeera Centre for Public Liberties & Human RightsAl Jazeera ForumAl Jazeera Hotel PartnersFollow Al Jazeera English: